S.Kaliappan v. The Comissioner, Mettur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.37250 of 2003 S.Kaliappan .. Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner.

Mettur Municipality, Mettur, Salem District.

.. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of demand Notice made in Na.Ka.No.3805/A1/2002 dated 28.10.2003 on the file of the respondent and to quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For Respondent : Mr.S.Saravanan

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.V.Elangovan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sts https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

The Commissioner.

Mettur Municipality, Mettur, Salem District.

+1cc to Mr.S.Saravanan, Advocate, S.R.No.51593 W.P.No.37250 of 2003 VGI(CO) GN(21/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/