Krishnan v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.10.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Krishnan ... Petitioner -vsState Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Kandhikuppam Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

(Crime No.279 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.279 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) **********

ORDER

1/4

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.08.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 109, 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 4 of TNPHW Act @ 296(b), 103, 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.279 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the occurrence date on 22.08.2025, due to intoxication the petitioner has abused his wife and the complainant and assaulted them and pushed the complainant on the floor and inflicted grievous injury to him and the injured person has succumbed to death and committed the alleged offence. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and he is in judicial custody from 22.08.2025 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner has arrayed as Accused No.1 and there is one previous case pending against the petitioner which is alleged offence under Section 302 IPC and he further submitted that this petitioner attacked three persons indiscriminately and caused death to one person and others are 2/4

undergoing treatment and the investigation is not completed and he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, there is one previous cases is pending against the petitioner and this petitioner has attacked entire family members, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16.10.2025 rna To 1.The Inspector of Police, Kandhikuppam Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

rna 16.10.2025 4/4