T.Prabhu v. The Deputy Director

W.P.No.39042 of 2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.

The 2nd respondent/The Commissioner, Krishnagiri Municipality, Krishnagiri filed a status report stating as follows, "......

6. It is humbly submitted that the 3 ^ (rd) respondent has paid the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- under section 134 of Tamil Nadu urban local bodies act 1998 with the fees Rs. 255000/- for the unauthorised building with the plan.

7. It is humbly submitted that the above plan has been rejected vide order dated 10.02.2025 on the ground of the violation of Tamil Nadu combined development and building rules, 2019 and 15days time has been mentioned in the order for the resubmission of the building plan after the rectification of the unauthorised building under construction in accordance with rules.

8. It is humbly submitted that the charge sheet has also been filed under section 133(5) read with section 180 of Tamil Nadu urban local bodies act through e-filing of cases to the Judicial 1st class Magistrate court, Krishnagiri for non-compliance of the notice with in the stipulated 1/3

time.

9. It is humbly requested the Honourable court that the action has been delayed since the non-availability of the technical staff in the town planning section of this municipality. Hence, it is respectfully requested that to consider the plea in the merit basis. And, I respectfully assured to the Honourable court that it will be followed periodically within the stipulated period as the direction given by the Honourable court."

2.

In view of the report, the 2nd respondent/Commissioner shall expedite the actions and conclude the same without causing any undue delay. 3.

Thus, no further orders are required.

(S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 17.02.2025 gd 2/3

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.

gd W.P.No.39042 of 2024 17.02.2025 3/3