Arunkumar v. The State Rep. By Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Arunkumar ... Petitioner Vs.
The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police, Tirupattur Unit, Tirupattur District.
(Crime No.264 of 2024).
... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with Crime No.264 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner :
Mr.M.Sathish Kumar For Respondent :
Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.264 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982, R/w Section 7(1) a (ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, is on board for 1/4
consideration.
2. The incarceration of the petitioner being from 12.11.2024 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He submits that the petitioner, without prejudice to the defence and contention, is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-, to any welfare scheme of the Government or any other organization. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court.
3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that the accused was found to be in illegal possession of 1,800 Kgs of PDS Rice. He further submits that the petitioner has got three previous cases.
4. Considering the voluntary submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), to the credit of District Revenue Officer, Tirupathur District, without prejudice to the right of defence before the Trial 2/4
Court and making it clear that it would not amount to admission of guilt.
5. Further, having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail on him executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.4, Vellore, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate 3/4
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.
Anu action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
13.12.2024 Anu To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.4, Vellore District.
2. The Inspector of Police, CSCID Police, Tirupattur Unit, Tirupattur District.
3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/4