Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd v. Union Of India Through Its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.06.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.Nos.46696 & 46697 of 2002 W.P.No.46696 of 2002 Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd.
Regd. Office: Cholapuram, South P.O.
Near Rajapalayam 626 139 Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu Rep by its Managing Director ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi - 110 011.
2.Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties, through its Designated Authority Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 011.
3.Reliance Industries Limited Makers Chambers-IV, 222, Nariman Point Mumbai - 400 021, through its Managing Director 4.Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited 51A, Industrial Area, Dist. Dhar Pithampur (M.P.) through its Managing Director ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the disclosure statement issued by the 2nd respondent in proceeding No.22/1/2001-DGAD dated 03.12.2002, quash the same.
W.P.No.46697 of 2002 Sree Karpagambal Mills Ltd.
Regd. Office: Cholapuram, South P.O.
Near Rajapalayam 626 139 Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu Rep by its Managing Director ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Union of India through its Secretary Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi - 110 011.
2.Directorate General of Anti-dumping and Allied Duties, through its Designated Authority Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 011.
3.Reliance Industries Limited Makers Chambers-IV, 222, Nariman Point Mumbai - 400 021, through its Managing Director 4.Indo Rama Synthetics (I) Limited 51A, Industrial Area, Dist. Dhar Pithampur (M.P.) through its Managing Director ... Respondents Prayer :
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to disclose all essential facts particularly those set out in para 27 the affidavit filed in support of the petition and to provide the petitioners adequate opportunity to comment/respond to the same before proceeding to make its final findings.
For Petitioner :
Mr.Karthik Rajan [in both WPs] For R4 :
Mr.D.Balaraman [in both WPs]
O R D E R
Mr.Karthik Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayers sought for in these writ petitions by the petitioner have become infructuous and also made the following endorsement:
"W.P.Nos.46696 and 46697 of 2002 have become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed"
2.In view of the submission and also the endorsement made in the petitions, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar maya sm:26.6.2018 W.P.Nos.46696 & 46697 of 2002