Tvl Radiant Insurance Broking Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner (St)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.10.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P. Nos. 42667 and 42668 of 2025 M/s. Radiant Insurance Broking Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Director, A. Narayanasamy ... Petitioner Vs.
Assistant Commissioner (ST), Royapettah Assessment Circle, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.
... Respondent Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in the impugned order passed by the respondent Order No.33AACCH0734K1ZU dated 21.08.2024 along with its accompanying summary and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr. K.G. Jayasuriya For Respondent : Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, Government Advocate
O R D E R
Mrs. K. Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
Page No. 1 of 6
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order in GSTIN: 33AACCH0734K1ZU dated 21.08.2024 of the Respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 22.05.2024 wherein the Petitioner was also called upon to appear for personal hearing.
4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminder on 09.07.2024, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed on 15.07.2024. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.
5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 21.09.2025. Page No. 2 of 6
6. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
7. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 22.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 21.08.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 22.05.2024.
9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance Page No. 3 of 6
with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit.
10. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
11. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
12. It is made clear that recovery of 50% of the disputed tax ordered above pertains only to the impugned Order dated 21.08.2024.
13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 09.10.2025 Index : Yes/No AT Page No. 4 of 6
To 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Royapettah Assessment Circle, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.
Page No. 5 of 6
C.SARAVANAN, J.
AT W.P. No. 38184 of 2025 and W.M.P. Nos. 42667 and 42668 of 2025 09.10.2025 Page No. 6 of 6