S.Indirani v. The Collector, Perambalur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.08.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.38391 of 2004 S.Indirani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Collector, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

2. The District Project Officer, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.3939/A1/04, dated 2.12.2004 and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.K.Bala Murugan, Government Advocate

ORDER

Mr.R.Suresh (Enrolment No.1002/2017), learned counsel representing Mr.P.Manoj Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on record has submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

Recording the submission and endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However there is no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

cla To

1. The Collector, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

2. The District Project Officer, Perambalur, Perambalur District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.60545 W.P.No.38391 of 2004 AR V CA(08/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/