Sampathkumar v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 03.01.2025

CORAM

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.DHANABAL CRL OP.No.31747 of 2024 Sampathkumar S/o. Kuppusamy ... Petitioner / Accused Vs State rep. by:- The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Respondent [Cr. No.17 of 2024] For Petitioner : Mr. B. Balavijayan For Respondent : Mr. S. Balaji, Government Advocate [Criminal side]

ORDER

Today the matter has been listed under the caption for 'being mentioned'.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the name of the police station has been wrongly mentioned in the 1/3

bail petition as All Women Police Station, Tiruvannamalai instead of All Women Rural Police Station, Tiruvannamalai and the said typographical error may be corrected.

3. Considering the said submission, the Registry is directed to issue fresh order copy after carrying out amendment. 03.01.2025 index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order mjs To 1.The Special Court for the exclusive trial of POCSO Act Cases, Tiruvannamalai

2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, All Women Rural Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Vellore. P.DHANABAL ,J mjs 2/3

03.01.2025 3/3