Indukrishnan v. The Commissioner, Ootacamund

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.06.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.No.36588 of 2002 Indukrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

The commissioner Ootacamund Municipality Ootacamund, Nilgiris.

... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent herein, pertaining to the order bearing Na.Ka.No.A4/2687/02 dt.13.8.2002 and quash the same and consequential direct the respondent herein to effect a downward revision in the property tax consequent upon the premises bearing Door No.50/H/14, Southwick, Coonoor Road, Ooty being no longer tenanted. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Ramesh, For Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondent :

Mr.P.Srinivas

O R D E R

Mr.R.Ramesh, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous and he also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the same, this writ petitions is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar maya +1cc to Mr.P.Srinivas, Advocate Sr.No.39361 sm:11/7/2018 W.P.No.36588 of 2002 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/