← Library
Madras High CourtWP/42358/2025disposed of

Muthu Mayilswami v. The Additional Cheif Secretary To Government

2026-04-09Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice K. Surender4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER Muthu Mayilswami S/o Muthu Gounder, No 9/115 Pudhoor Naangu Road, Mecheri Guttapatti Post, Mettur Taluk Salem District 636 453 ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Additional Cheif Secretary To Government Revenue And Disaster Management Department Chief Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009

2. The Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005

3. The District Collector Salem District, Salem 636 001

4. The Reveneu Divisional Officer Mettur 636 401 Salem District

5. The Tahsildar Mettur 636 401 Salem District ..Respondent(s) Directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioners statutory Revision petition dated 10.11.2023 submitted under section 10-A of the Tamil nadu land Encroachment Act 1905 and representation dated 05.01.2024 for reclassification of Local Fund Road in Survey no 341/1 of M. Kalipatti village, Mettur Taluk, Salem district on merits and in accordance with law

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.P.Jagadeesan For Respondent(s):

Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R5 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the statutory revision.

2. No doubt, the revisional authority is the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Therefore, fixing the timeline may cause inconvenience to the authority. However, the statutory appeals are to be disposed of systematically and in the order of seniority to ensure that no appeal is kept pending unnecessary for enormous period.

3. The grievances of the revision petitioner are to be addressed as expeditiously as possible so as to ensure that the issues are settled.

4. In the present case, the revision petition has been submitted by the petitioner on 10.11.2023 and two and a half years lapsed. Thus, the first respondent is directed to proceed with the appeal by conducting an enquiry and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of . No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi

To

1. The Additional Cheif Secretary To Government Revenue And Disaster Management Department Chief Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009

2. The Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005

3. The District Collector Salem District, Salem 636 001

4. The Reveneu Divisional Officer Mettur 636 401 Salem District

5. The Tahsildar Mettur 636 401 Salem District

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.

AND K.SURENDER J.

vsi 09-04-2026