Vedan v. Murugan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.03.2026 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN 1.Vedan S/o.Bommusamu Nariyampatti, Mampatti Post Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

2.Sankar S/o.Bomman Vedappatti Road Tharamangalam Post Omalur Taluk, Salem District.

Appellants Vs 1.Murugan S/o.Duraisamy Boyar Street, Rangampalayam Konganapuram Village and Post Edappady Taluk, Salem District.

2.The District Collector, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankari, Salem District.

4.The Tahsildar Edappady Taluk Office 5.Murugesan S/o.Annan Kurinji Nagar, Konganapuram Village and Post Edapaddy Taluk, Salem District.

6.Vadivel, S/o.Arumugam, Boyar Street, Rangampalayam, Konganapuram Village and Post Edappady Taluk Respondents PRAYER : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.31230 of 2025, dated 20.08.2025.

For Appellant:

Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents:

Mr.E.Vijay Anand Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2 to R4

JUDGMENT

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellants as well as respondent Nos.2 to 4 submit that the issue raised in the writ petition has already been decided in O.S.No.58 of 2025 and, therefore, nothing survives for

adjudication in this writ appeal.

In view of the above submission, the writ appeal is dismissed having rendered infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 10.03.2026 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No sasi To:

1.The District Collector, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sankari, Salem District.

3.The Tahsildar Edappady Taluk Office

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.

(sasi) 10.03.2026