Devayani v. The State Represented By The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.10.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Crl.O.P.No.27133 of 2025
1. Devayani
2. Jeyapriya
3. Selvam ... Petitioners Vs.
The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Jolarpet Police Station, Thirupathur District.
(Crime No.308/2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.308 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioners : Mr.C.D. Sugumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of BNS 2023 in Crime No.308 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
1/6
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to illegal affair between one Manobalu/husband of the first petitioner and the defacto complainant, there was dispute among the petitioner's family and the defacto complainant which escalated into violence and assault. Hence the case has been registered. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case; that the petitioners have never committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution; and that the petitioners are ready to produce solvent sureties and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and also undertake to appear and to co-operate for the investigation, and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. He further submitted that the injured has been discharged from hospital.
5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.
6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of 2/6
allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, the fact that the injured has been discharged from hospital and since custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I at Thirupathur District on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate/Judge concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the 3rd petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 p.m. until further orders, the 3/6
1st and 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
03.10.2025 smn Note:-
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.
4/6
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.I Thirupathur District Panruti 2.The Inspector of Police Jolarpet Police Station, Thirupathur District.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
smn/kas 5/6
03.10.2025 6/6