← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/31814/2024dismissed

Abirami v. The State Rep By

2024-12-20Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.12.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No. 31814 of 2024 Abirami ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur Police Station, Kanchipuram District.

(Cr.No. 1101 of 2018) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail pending trial in S.C. No. 77 of 2024 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram.

For Petitioner :

Mr.D. Senthil For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

Petition seeking bail in S.C. No. 77 of 2024 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram, in respect of Crime No.1101 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC is on board for consideration.

1/4

2.The incarceration of the petitioner being from 01.09.2018 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He also submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody for the past six year. He also submits that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offences and she is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail, submits that in S.C. No. 77 of 2024, pending on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram, the trial is nearing completion, with the case now scheduled for the cross examination of the Investigating Officer.

He further submits that if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of him absconding and not available for trial proceedings. 4.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record , this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

direction to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge at Kanchipuram, to complete the trial as early as possible.

20.12.2024 sai To 1.

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kancheepuram.

2.

The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur Police Station, Kanchipuram District.

3.

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

sai 20.12.2024 4/4