Purushothaman v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :03.10.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Crl.O.P.No.27414 of 2025
1. Purushothaman
2. Srinivasan @ Seenu ... Petitioners Vs.
State, represented by The Inspector of Police, Tiruttani Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
(Crime No.397 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.397 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Chandra Sekar For Respondent : Ms.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate(Crl. Side)
O R D E R
1/6
The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.08.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 351(3) of BNS Act and Section 3, 4(a) of Explosive Substance Act, 1908, in Crime No.397 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, petitioners along with other accused had thrown country made bomb against the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioners were arrested and they are in judicial custody from 10.08.2025 and they are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.
2/6
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.
6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, and also considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioners shall report before the concerned Judicial Magistrate on all working day at 10.30.a.m., and appear before the respondent police at 10.30.a.m., on every Saturday and Sunday until further orders:
3/6
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
03.10.2025 sma/kmm Note:-
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To 4/6
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Tirutanni.
2. The Inspector of Police, Tiruttani Police Station, Thiruvallur District.
3. Central Prison, Puzhal.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
sma/kmm Crl.O.P.No.27414 of 2025 Dated: 03.10.2025 6/6