← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/32258/2024granted

Mohammed Malik v. The State Rep By

2025-01-02Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA N.Mohammed Malik ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, D4 Zambazzar Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.201 of 2024).

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with Crime No.201 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Thirugnanam For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.201 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) r/w Sections 22(b), 25 and 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, is on board for consideration.

1/4

2. The incarceration of the petitioner being from 30.11.2024 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He further submits that even as per the prosecution, the alleged contraband recovered from the petitioner is an intermediate quantity. He also submits that the petitioner, without prejudice to the defence and contention, is ready and willing to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- to any welfare scheme of the Government or any other organization. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that the accused were found to be in illegal possession of 28 Nitravet tablets (10mg) and 40 Tydol tablets (100 mg), out of which, 3 Nitravet and 6 Tydol tablets were recovered from the petitioner/A1 herein. He further submits that one previous case of similar nature is pending against the petitioner and the present case is under investigation.

4. Considering the voluntary submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of "Charu Home for Aged, Account 2/4

Number : 2771201000291, IFSC Code : CNRB0002771, Canara Bank, Mahila Br., T.Nagar Chennai - 17", without prejudice to the right of defence before the trial Court and making it clear that it would not amount to admission of guilt.

5. Further, having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record including the counter filed by the respondent and considering that the contraband recovered from the petitioner is an intermediate quantity, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 06.30 p.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.

ham [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

02.01.2025 ham To

1. The II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, D4 Zambazzar Police Station, Chennai.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/4