S.Arulmozhi v. The Taluk Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.25609 of 2025 S.Arulmozhi ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Taluk Tahsildar, Chenglepet Taluk, Taluk Office Campus at Chenglepet. 2.The Revenue Inspector, Chenglepet Firka, Taluk Office Campus at Chenglepet.

3.The Village Administrative Officer for Anjur Village, Village Panchayat Office Campus at Anjur, Anjur Village and post, Chenglepet Taluk and District. 4.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its District Collector, Chenglepet District at Chenglepet.

5.The Block Development Officer, Kattankulathur Panchayat Union, at Kattankulathur, Chengalpet Taluk 6.The Anjur Village Panchayat, Rep. by its President, Anjur Village and Post, Chengalpet Taluk and District. ... Respondents 1/6

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the B-Diary order, dated 12.08.2025 passed in O.S.No.10 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Chengalpet and consequentially direct the learned District Munsif to give an opportunity to the PW1 as continue and depose his evidence in the suit. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Dayalan For R1 to R4 : Mr.C.Sathish Government Advocate For R5 and R6 : Mr.V.Ramesh Government Advocate

O R D E R

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the B-Diary Order passed by the Trial Court closing the evidence of PW.1 and adjourning the matter for further evidence of plaintiff side, by its order dated 12.08.2025 in O.S.No.10 of 2021. 2/6

2. It is seen from the impugned order PW.1 was cross examined by defendants 1 to 5 and the matter was posted for cross examination of PW.1 by 6th defendant. At that stage, the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff expressed her disinterest in continuing with trial and the recording the same, the Trial Court closed the evidence of PW.1 and adjourned the matter for examination of other witnesses. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner/plaintiff has come before this Court.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents would submit that they are ready to continue the cross examination of PW.1 on 08.12.2025, next date of hearing.

5. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to produce PW.1 for cross examination on 3/6

08.12.2025. The 6th defendant shall cross examine PW.1 on that day and the examination of PW.1 shall be completed on the very same date. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 10.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No : Yes / No dm 4/6

To 1.The District Munsif, Chengalpet.

2.The Taluk Tahsildar, Chenglepet Taluk, Taluk Office Campus at Chenglepet. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Chenglepet Firka, Taluk Office Campus at Chenglepet.

4.The Village Administrative Officer for Anjur Village, Village Panchayat Office Campus at Anjur, Anjur Village and post, Chenglepet Taluk and District. 5.The District Collector, State of Tamil Nadu, Chenglepet District at Chenglepet.

6.The Block Development Officer, Kattankulathur Panchayat Union, at Kattankulathur, Chengalpet Taluk 7.The President, Anjur Village Panchayat, Anjur Village and Post, Chengalpet Taluk and District. 5/6

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm 10.11.2025 6/6