R.Jayakumar v. R. Uma

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-01-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL RC No.2005 of 2025 R.Jayakumar S/o.K.Rama Gounder, Door No.3/206-A, Nadupalayam Road, Pattanam, Sulur Taluk, Ondipudur Post, Coimbatore.

..Petitioner Vs R. Uma W/o.Rajesh, Door No.3/206-B, Nadupalayam Road, Pattanam, Sulur Taluk, Ondipudur Post, Coimbatore.

..Respondent To set aside the order passed in C.A.No.167 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dated 20.03.2025 against in C.C.No.352/2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore dated 22.04.2024. For Petitioner:

S.Syed Mazhar Hayath For Respondent:

Mr.C.S.Saravanan

ORDER

The revision has been filed challenging the judgment rendered in Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 2024 by the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore confirming the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore __________Page 1 of 4

in C.C.No.352 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- towards compensation and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month.

2. This court, by order dated 10.10.2025, had suspended the sentence of imprisonment of the petitioner on a condition that the petitioner should deposit a sum of Rs.1,60,000/- to the credit of C.C.No.352 of 2020. However, it appears that even before the order passed by this court, the petitioner was arrested on 9.10.2025 in execution of the judgment passed by the appellate court.

3. Whileso, learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of the letter written by the petitioner from the Central Prison, Coimbatore, which is duly attested by the Additional Superintendent of Central Prison, Coimbatore, stating that the petitioner does not intend to pursue the revision and is willing to serve the remaining period of sentence in prison.

4. In view of the stand taken by the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the revision. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition is dismissed. Consequently, the petitioner shall serve the sentence imposed on him by the Trial Court, as confirmed by the appellate court.

06-01-2026 __________Page 2 of 4

ssk Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To

1. I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.

2. Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore.

3. R. UmaW/o.Rajesh, Door No.3/206-B, Nadupalayam Road, Pattanam, Sulur Taluk, Ondipudur Post, Coimbatore.

__________Page 3 of 4

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

ssk CRL RC No.2005 of 2025 06-01-2026 __________Page 4 of 4