← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1020/2025dismissed

T.Anto Punitha v. Sri Kandha Guru Real Estates

2025-02-24Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

1. T.Anto Punitha

2. R.Shali

3. M.P.Gunasekaran

4. G.Nithya

5. D.Vinothini

6. P.Kavitha

7. M.Vadivel

8. Vanitha

9. Lakshmi

10. R.Ravikumar

11. N.Manikandan

12. K.Susila Bai

13. Y.Parimalam

14. S.Karuppasamy

15. R.Anand

16. R.Amutha

17. R.Senthilnathan

18. B.J.Prabhu

19. N.R.Dinesh Babu

20. M.Rajesh Kanna

21. M.J.Babu

22. K.Mohan Raj

23. K.P.Sachidanand

24. M.Rajammal

25. C.Sulochana

26. C.Pugalendhi

27. C.Jayaseelan

28. V.Nalini

29. C.Rani

30. C.Elavendhan

31. V.Krishnamoorthi

32. M.Pounraj

33. S.Devagi

34. Harsha Belli

35. D.Ravichandran

36. S.Vanitha

37. S.Srikanth

38. D.Ganesan

39. K.Sankarasnamasivayam

40. P.Murali

41. K.Vanipriya

42. R.Karthikeyan

43. R.Ramkumar

44. Savithiri Raman

45. P.Kavitha

46. C.Manikandan

47. K.Kaladevi

48. R.Charless

49. N.Rajasekar

50. V.Vijayalakshmi

51. R.Nammalwar

52. K.Kulandai Velu

53. T.Selvakumar

54. D.Mahalakshmi

55. K.Pugazhendhi

56. S.Anbarasi

57. D.Pravin Kumar

58. Senthil Kumar

59. Eswari

60. M.Palaniyappan

61. N.Chinna Muniyappan

62. S.Vargees

63. K.Karuppaiah ... Petitioner Vs.

1. Sri Kandha Guru Real Estates, A Firm rep. by its Managing Partner, P.A.Madeshwaran, P.G.V.Kalvi Niruvana Valagam, Varadapalayam, Thdiyalur, Coimbatore District.

2. P.A.Madeshwaran

3. M.Kavitha

4. The State Rep.by the Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing-II, Coimbatore.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct the learned Special Court under TNPID Act, Coimbatore to pay the interest amount of the petitioners from the date of their deposit to till the date of repayment by collecting the amount from the respondents 1 to 3.

For Petitioners :

Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondents :

Mr.N.Manokaran (for R1 to R3) Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R4

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the learned Special Court under the TNPID Act, Coimbatore, to pay the interest amount of the petitioners from the date of their deposit till the date of repayment, by collecting the amount from respondents 1 to 3.

2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.

3. The petitioners had entered into an agreement with the first to third respondents, on the assurance given by them for registering a sale deed and deposit of consideration by 46 installments. The petitioners had made the last installment on 10.12.2024. However, the first to third respondents failed to fulfil the conditions and as such, the petitioners had complained and the same has been registered as an FIR in Crime No. 2 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC and Section 5 of the TNPID Act. After completion of the investigation, the fourth respondent filed a final report and the same is pending for trial in C.C. No. 7 of 2018 on the file of the Special Court under the TNPID Act, Coimbatore. While the trial was pending, the petitioners settled the amount, which was already deposited by them.

4. On a perusal of the counter affidavit and submissions made by the fourth respondent, it reveals that already 125 depositors had filed an affidavit before the Special Court under the TNPID Act, Coimbatore and as directed by this Court, they were paid the amount which was deposited by them. The

remaining 34 depositors, 19 depositors were settled out of Court. Further, 8 depositors have not received either deposit amount so far, or land from the accused.

5. That apart, 52 fresh complaints have also been received by the fourth respondent against respondents 1 to 3, who committed default in executing the assurance given by them. Therefore, if the petitioners are not satisfied with the amount settled by the accused, viz., the respondents 1 to 3 herein, they can agitate before the trial Court during the trial by not accepting the compounding of the offence. Therefore, the direction sought for in this Criminal Original Petition cannot be considered and it is liable to be dismissed.

6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 24.02.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order kv

To

1. The Inspector of Police, Economic Offence Wing-II, Coimbatore.

2. The Special Court under TNPID Act, Coimbatore.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

kv 24.02.2025