R.H.Sakunthala v. Authorised Officer, Indian

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 5/10/2017 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.28862 of 2004 R.H.Sakunthala ... Petitioner Vs The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank Sowcarpet Branch Sowcarpet Chennai 600 079.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of certiorari to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned possession notice of the respondent dated 7/9/2004 made under Section 13 (4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and quash the same as null and void.

For Petitioner ...

No appearance.

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J) Guarantor has challenged possession notice, dated 7/9/2004, issued under Section 13 (4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

2. Record of proceeding does not indicate any interim order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. On 24/7/2017, when the matter was listed before the learned Single Judge, there was no representation.

4. Even today, there is no representation, on behalf of the petitioner. Hence the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mvs.

W.P.No.28862 of 2004 Rmp(30/10/17) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/