Dinesh @ Pavadai Dinesh v. State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Dinesh @ Pavadai Dinesh ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

Crime No.510 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.510 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner :

Mr.K.Selva Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.08.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS [equal to Sections 341, 294(b), 392, 397, 506(ii) of IPC] in Crime No.510 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. This Court had already dismissed the bail application of the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.26576 of 2025, dated 26.09.2025, by stating the following reasons:

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is involved in 14 previous cases.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the gravity of the offences and bad antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

3. Today, 27.10.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail. 2/4

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner, submitting that the final report has not yet been filed.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and taking into fact that this Court, by order dated 26.09.2025, had already dismissed Crl.O.P.No.26576 of 2025 filed by the petitioner, and this is the second bail petition with no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to reconsider the same.

7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 27.10.2025 cda 3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

27.10.2025 4/4