← Library
Madras High CourtWP/40258/2025dismissed with liberty

K.Mahalakshmi v. The Registrar General

2025-11-20Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20-11-2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP No. 40258 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 45217 OF 2025 K.Mahalakshmi W/o.J.Krishnan, D.No.260, Annanesavalar Colony, Paparapatti, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri.

..Petitioner Vs

1. The Registrar General High Court Of Madras, High Court Campus, Chennai- 600 104.

2. The Principal District Judge Krishnagiri District Court, Krishnagiri.

3. The Family Court Judge, Family Court, Krishnagiri ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for records pertaining to the impugned Notice D.No. 802/ 2025 dated 29.08.2025 of the 3rd Respondent to recover Rs.1,70,291/- from the petitioner, as excess pay and allowance due to wrong fixation of pay for the period from 04.03.2015 to 01.08.2025.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.E. Ravichandran For Respondents :

Mr.Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar Order (Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.)

The impugned order dated 29.08.2025 is only a show cause notice as to why recovery shall not be made against the petitioner, as excess amount has been paid mistakenly by the employer and though three days time was given within which time since no reply has been given and no further order has been passed making the recovery from the petitioner, at this stage the show cause notice since has been questioned, we are not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

2. However, since the date of the show cause notice is 29.08.2025 and three days time given by the respondents is already over and, till date no final order since has been passed according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to give liberty to the petitioner to give reply to the show cause notice dated 29.08.2025. On receipt of such reply, the respondents shall consider the same and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. If any final order is passed against the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to agitate the issue in the manner known to law.

3. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.S.K.,J.) (H.C.,J.) 20-11-2025

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order KST To

1. The Registrar General High Court Of Madras, High Court Campus, Chennai- 600 104.

2. The Principal District Judge Krishnagiri District Court, Krishnagiri.

3. The Family Court Judge, Family Court, Krishnagiri

R.SURESH KUMAR J.

AND HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR J.

KST AND WMP NO. 45217 OF 2025 20-11-2025