Nedungulam Panchayat Rep.By v. 1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 29.06.2017 Coram :

The Honourable Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Writ Petition No.38327 of 2003 and W.P.M.P.No.46525 of 2003 Nedungulam Panchayat Rep. by its President, Mr.P.Selvaraj, Nedungulam Post, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin.

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Secretary to Government Department, Local Administrations, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Panchayat Development Committee, Tuticorin. ...Respondents PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records EA/plastic waste Road/2003 dated 03.11.2003 on the file of the 2nd respondent and to quash the same in so far it is against the petitioner.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Rajesh Vivekananthan For Respondents:

Mr.R.Vijayakumar, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The Nedungulam Panchayat represented by its former President, filed this writ petition, challenging the order passed by the District Collector-cum-Chairman,in EA/plastic waste Road/2003 on 03.11.2003 with regard to the laying of roads within the jurisdiction of the writ petitioner Panchayat.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. A policy decision was taken by the second respondent, in pursuant to the directions issued by the Government and they have already implemented the scheme and laid roads. Infact the respondents themselves had implemented the said scheme for the welfare of the people of that locality.

4. Since, the impugned order relating to the welfare policy of the people, more specifically for the welfare of the people in that locality, this Court is not inclined to consider the grounds raised in this writ petition and the policy decision of the Government, cannot be questioned, by the writ petitioner, who is the former President of the Panchayat.

5. Such being the factum of the matter, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar jer To

1. The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamilnadu, Local Administrations, Fort. St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The District Collector-cum-Chairman, District Panchayat Development Committee, Tuticorin.

WP.NO.38327 OF 2003 RJ(CO) NR 13/07/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/