← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/960/2025dismissed

Ammulu @ Parameshwari v. The State Rep By

2025-01-20Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

CRL OP NO. 960 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 960 of 2025 Ammulu @ Parameshwari W/o.Guna, No.98 Pallavan Street, Chellampattidai, Gunagarapakkam, Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu-631 553. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sunguvarchathiram Police Station, Kancheepuram District, (Crime No.588 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

Anbharasu A R.Seshadri For Respondent(s):

S.Santhosh Public Prosecutor Madras High Court.

ORDER

The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(c) and 4(1- A)(ii) of TNP Act, in Crime No.588 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the second anticipatory bail petition and the earlier petition was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 22.11.2024. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

case and he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, is that the petitioner, along with the other accused, was found to be in illegal possession of 12 unsealed brandy and on checking the bottles, it was found that some poisonous substance has been added in the said bottles. He further submitted that there are eleven previous cases pending against the petitioner which are similar in nature. 4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 5.Considering the gravity of offence committed by the accused and that the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, at this stage. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 20-01-2025 msv To The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sunguvarchathiram Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis