Vinoth @ Ktm Vinoth v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Vinoth @ KTM Vinoth ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, M-4, Redhills Police Station, Chennai.

Crime No.629 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.629 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Kartik Soundararajan For Respondent :

Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

1/6

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in Crime No.629 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused, while preparing to commit dacoity, police have intercepted and arrested three persons and based on the confession of arrested accused, petitioner was added as accused in this case. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that on the date of alleged occurrence, petitioner was at Tiruchengode and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, based on the confession of the arrested accused, petitioner has been included in this case. He further submitted that, investigation is pending. Hence, he opposed 2/6

for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and the nature of allegations made against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of ten days from 3/6

the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the concerned Judicial Magistrate on all working day at 10.30.a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 4/6

13.10.2025 sma To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri.

2.The Inspector of Police, M-4, Redhills Police Station, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 5/6

13.10.2025 6/6