A.Gunasekaran v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.09.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.39325 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.46894 of 2004 A.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Collector, Tindivanam Villupuram District.

2.The Block Development Officer, Vallam, Villupuram District.

... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the first respondent in R.O.C.No.PA4/11418/2003 dated 29.10.2003 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all back wages and attendent benefits. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari for R1 Government Advocate Mr.P.S.Sivashanmuga Sundaram for R2 Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

When the matter was listed on 13.09.2017 and on 20.09.2017 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. The matter is listed today (22.09.2017), under the caption 'for dismissal' and once again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To

1. The Collector, Tindivanam Villupuram District.

2. The Block Development Officer, Vallam, Villupuram District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr. 70911 W.P.No.39325 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.46894 of 2004 AR(IV) VR(2710/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/