← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/12/2025granted

Sanjay v. State Represented By, Inspector Of Police

2025-01-06Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

1. Sanjay

2. Ramachandran ... Petitioners Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, M-6, Manali Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

(Crime No.591 of 2024).

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in connection with Crime No.591 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioners :

Mr.T.I.Ramanathan For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.591 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(4), 311 and 351(3) of BNS, is on board for consideration.

1/4

2. The incarceration of the petitioners/A1 & A5 being from 28.11.2024 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioners and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks indulgence of this Court. He further submits that the petitioners are in no way connected with the alleged offence, however, in order to keep them under fetters, the respondent had implicated them in this case. He also submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that since the de facto complainant had refused to give money as demanded by the accused, the petitioners along with three other accused had abused the de facto complainant in filthy language and by intimidating him at knife point, extorted a sum of Rs.9000/- and a mobile phone from him and also threatened him with dire consequences. He further submits that only a sum of Rs.2000/- and a mobile phone have been recovered from the accused and the investigation in this case is still pending. He also submits that two previous cases are pending against the first petitioner and in respect of the second petitioner one previous case is pending.

2/4

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions and accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing separate bond each for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties (out of which, one surety should be a blood related surety of the petitioners), each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police on everyday at 06.30 p.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the 3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.

ham learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

06.01.2025 ham To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvottiyur.

2. The Inspector of Police, M-6, Manali Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison -II, Puzhal.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/4