The Manager v. Balu

CMP No.3121 of 2025 in CMA SR No.175571 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with.

Though notice was served on the first respondent and his name appears in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the first respondent.

Private notice served on the second respondent, however, there is no representation on behalf of the second respondent.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the third respondent.

Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 627 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

Petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period.

Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission.

Registry is directed to print the name of Ms.R.Sreevidhya, counsel for the third respondent at the time of admission.

mst 17.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis