← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18846/2004dismissed for default

Dr.V.M.Gangadaran v. The Superintending Engineer

2017-07-28Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.Nos.18846 and 18847 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.22589 and 22590 of 2004 Dr.V.M.Gangadaran .. Petitioner in W.P.No.18846 of 2004 Mr.M.P.Govinda Nair .. Petitioner in W.P.No.18847 of 2004 Vs.

The Superintending Engineer, CEDC (Central), Valluvarkottam, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

.. Respondent in both the Writ Petitions Writ Petition No.18846 of 2004 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent and authorities functioning under him to receive the application of the petitioner for supply of electricity, consider the same and direct regular supply of electricity of residential tariff basis to the various units of the petitioner in No.7, Azizmulk 1st Street, Thousand Lights, Chennai-6, without insisting upon the production of the completion certificate from the CMDA/Corporation of Chennai, in the light of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, within such time as may be fixed by this Court.

Writ Petition No.18847 of 2004 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent and authorities functioning under him to receive the application of the petitioner for supply of electricity, consider the same and direct regular supply of electricity of residential tariff basis to the various units of the petitioner in New No.18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34, without insisting upon the production of the completion certificate from the CMDA/Corporation of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chennai, in the light of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, within such time as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioners :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar

ORDER

When the Writ Petitions came up for hearing on 20.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners, and hence, this Court directed the petitions to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 21.07.2017. On 21.07.2017, when the Writ Petitions were taken up for disposal, learned counsel for the petitioners requested time to verify and report as to whether anything survives for consideration in these Writ Petitons, and hence, the Writ Petitions were directed to be listed under the caption "for orders" today. Even today (28.07.2017), when the Writ Petitions are listed under the caption "for orders", there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the Writ Petitions are dismissed for default. No costs. W.P.M.Ps. are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cs Copy to :

The Superintending Engineer, CEDC (Central), Valluvarkottam, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

W.P.Nos.18846 and 18847 of 2004 MG(CO) GN(22/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/