K.Andalammal v. Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19/11/2015 C O R A M THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.37427 of 2002 K.Andalammal ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Commissioner Dindigul Municipality Dindigul.

2. Thayarammal ...

Respondents Prayer :-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.18305/2000/A6 dated 16/7/2002, quash the same. For petitioner ...

Mr.M.V.Krishnan For respondents ...

Mr.R.Rajeswaran Special Government Pleader for R.1.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in this matter and hence the same may be dismissed as infructuous and also makes an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mvs.

To

1. The Commissioner,Dindigul Municipality, Dindigul. W.P.No.37427 of 2002 bvr co, kra 26.11.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/