A.Raman v. The Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.29737 of 2004 and W.M.P.No.36115 of 2004 A.Raman

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

... Respondent Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.45014/2004/X-2 dated 29.09.2004 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all attendant benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj Kumar For Respondents : MrZakkir Hussain Government Advocate

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted also made an endorsement that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.

2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (J) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar kas https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Collector, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.

+1cc to Government Pleader in sr.no.63356 W.P.No.29737 of 2004 SV(CO) NR 03/10/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/