← Library
Madras High CourtWP/44604/2025disposed of

Tvl.Sri Sarangapani Jewellery v. Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac),

2025-11-24Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan8 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.

44604 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.

49754 and 49755 of 2025 TVL. Sri Sarangapani Jewellery, Represent by its Proprietor, S.Vignesh, 524A, First Floor, Vysial Street, Angalamman Kovil Street, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu - 641 001.

... Petitioner Vs.

Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Big Bazaar Street Circle, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 018.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order bearing Ref No.ZD3306250455883 dated 05.06.2025 for FY 2021-2022 for GST:33ADMPV7292E2Z2, passed under Section 73 of the Page No. 1 of 8

TNGST Act, 2017 by the Respondent, to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to drop all related proceeding. For Petitioner : Ms.B.Revathi for Mr.M.Velmurugan For Respondent : Mrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate

ORDER

Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 05.06.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 02.12.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for Page No. 2 of 8

personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 05.06.2025.

4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 14.03.2025 and 16.04.2025, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing despite multiple opportunities. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.

5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 15.11.2025.

6. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay Page No. 3 of 8

in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

7. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 dated 02.12.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 05.06.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 02.12.2024.

9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with Page No. 4 of 8

law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated.

10. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and no other amount is in arrears barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

11. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

12. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

Page No. 5 of 8

13. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 24.11.2025 Index : Yes/No av To:

Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Big Bazaar Street Circle, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu - 641 018.

Page No. 6 of 8

C.SARAVANAN, J.

av W.P.No.

44604 of 2025 and Page No. 7 of 8

W.M.P.Nos.

49754 and 49755 of 2025 24.11.2025 Page No. 8 of 8