Dhanasekaran M v. M/S.Tvs Credit Services Limited

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH 1.Dhanasekaran.M 2.Kanniyammal.K 3.Murugesan.G .... Petitioners Vs 1.M/s.TVS Credit Services Limited Chaitanya, No.12, Khader Nawaz Khan Road Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.

And Customer Correspondence Office at :

3rd Floor, Bristol Towers, Plot No.10 South Phase, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate Adjacent to Maruti Service Masters Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

2.Mrs.V.Shalini Arbitrator No.650, 'W-Block'

Model Lane Housing Board, Cemetery Road Chennai - 600 021.

3.M/s.Chamber of Arbitration and Mediation (CAM) No.9, Eldams Square, 167, Eldams Road Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018.

.... Respondents 1/4

Prayer : Original Petition (Commercial Division) filed under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to terminate the mandate of the second respondent and consequently terminate the present arbitration proceedings in A.C.P. No.(TVS-CS) 1769 of 2025 and pass orders.

For Petitioners : Mr.Antony R.Julian For Respondents : Mr.M.Arunachalam for R1

ORDER

This original petition has been filed under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to terminate the mandate of the second respondent and to terminate the present arbitration proceedings pending before the second respondent.

2. Heard Mr.Antony R.Julian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.M.Arunachalam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent submitted that the 2/4

arbitration proceedings came to an end on 25.08.2025, when the Arbitrator recused from proceeding further with the case. The learned counsel for the first respondent further submitted that as on date, there is no amount due and payable by the petitioners and therefore, there is no cause of action for the first respondent to proceed further with the arbitration proceedings.

4. In the light of the above development, this Court makes it clear that the pending arbitration proceedings, conducted by the second respondent, stands terminated, and as on date, there is no cause of action for the first respondent to initiate arbitration proceedings against the petitioners since there is no amount due and payable by the petitioners to the first respondent.

5. Accordingly the present original application is disposed of. No costs.

13.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order ds 3/4

N.ANAND VENKATESH,J.

ds 13.11.2025 4/4