Tvl Metro Computer v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.11.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.46522 and 46523 of 2025 Tvl.Metro Computers, Represented by its Proprietor Nirmal Kumar Challani.
... Petitioner Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chepauk Assessment Circle, Fanepet, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.
... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Respondent in order dated 19.11.2024 in GSTN:33ABPPN9409E1ZH/2021-22 bearing Reference No.ZD331124149745F and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.C.Rekhakumari For Respondent : Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate Page No. 1 of 6
ORDER
Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order in FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Ref.N.ZD331124149745F dated 19.11.2024, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 03.08.2023 wherein the Petitioner was also called upon to appear for personal hearing.
4. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Orders has already expired.
Page No. 2 of 6
5. Under similar circumstances, Order has been quashed and case has been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
6. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 03.08.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 19.11.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 03.08.2023.
8. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Page No. 3 of 6
Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated.
9. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
10. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
11. It is made clear that recovery of 50% of the disputed tax ordered above pertains only to the impugned Order dated 19.11.2024. Page No. 4 of 6
12. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 03.11.2025 jas To:
The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chepauk Assessment Circle, Fanepet, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.
Page No. 5 of 6
C.SARAVANAN, J.
jas and W.M.P.Nos.46522 and 46523 of 2025 03.11.2025 Page No. 6 of 6