← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/29141/2025dismissed

Vijayakumar @ Kavur Viji v. The Inspector Of Police

2025-10-27Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.29141 of 2025 Vijayakumar @ Kavur Viji ... Petitioner Vs.

The Inspector of Police, Chengalpet Taluk Police Station, Chengalpet.

Crime No.433 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.433 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

M.Dhana Sekar For Respondent :

Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.433 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.07.2024, based on the secret information, the respondent police came to know about selling of drug substance in the place of occurrence and they found that the accused Nos.1 to 4 were found in possession of 2 kgs of ganja and on confession of 1st accused they came to know about the involvement of this petitioner and the fifth accused in the above said offence, thereby this petitioner has been arrayed as 6th accused in this case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has twenty previous cases.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

2/4

6. Considering the gravity of the offence committed by the petitioner, and also the bad antecedents against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 27.10.2025 kmm 3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

kmm To

1. The Inspector of Police, Chengalpet Taluk Police Station, Chengalpet.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.29141 of 2025 27.10.2025 4/4