Madras High CourtWP/1346/2026disposed of

Latchumamma v. The District Revenue Officer

2026-01-23Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Latchumamma Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Revenue officer District Revenue office, Krishnagiri 635 2.The Sub Collector Sub district Collectorate office, Hosur 635 109, Krishnagiri district 3.The Taluk Tahsildar Office of The Taluk Tahsildar, Soolagiri 635117 Krishnagiri district Respondent(s) PRAYER directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 10.06.2024 for rectification of errors in the Revenue Records in respect of the land measuring to an extent of 0.11.0 Hectare comprised in Survey No. 39/2, 0.27.0 hectare comprised in Survey No. 40/3, 0.10.0 hectare comprised in Survey No. 42/1 and 0.03.0 hectare comprised in Survey No.42/3 situate at Attakurukki Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District and to issue patta to the petitioner to an extent of 0.11.0 hectare comprised in Survey No.39/2, 0.27.0 hectare comprised in survey No. 40/3, 0.10.0 hectare comprised in Survey No.42/1 and 0.03.0 hectare comprised in Survey No. 42/3 situate at Attakurukki

Village, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District within a time period to be stipulated by this Honble court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R. Bharath Kumar For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Arumugam, Govt Advocate

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2024 seeking for rectification of the alleged errors in the revenue records for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.Since the aforesaid representation was not considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2024 seeking for rectification of the alleged entries in the revenue records for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

23-01-2026 vga To 1.The District Revenue officer District Revenue office, Krishnagiri 635 2.The Sub Collector Sub district Collectorate office, Hosur 635 109 , Krishnagiri district 3.The Taluk Tahsildar Office of The Taluk Tahsildar , Soolagiri 635117 Krishnagiri district

ABDUL QUDDHOSE J.

vga 23-01-2026