Naasar P v. The District Collector,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.11.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN Naasar P ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector,
2. The Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
3. The Block Development Officer, Kundrathur Panchayat Union,
4. The Executive Officer, Varatharajapuram Gram Panchayat, Kundrathur Panchayat Union,
5. P.Rajendran ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to direct the 4th respondent to assess separate property tax for six houses constructed in Door No.78, Ward No.4, Survey No.214/44, Patta No.18956 an extent of 2800 Page No. 1 of 5
sq.fts in Vijay Nagar 2nd Cross Street, Varatharajapuram Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District in the name of the 5th respondent by modifying the single Property Tax Assessment No.4827 for the said property by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.09.2025, within the period as stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudharasan For R1&R2 : Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Special Government Pleader For R3&R4 : Mrs.P.Selvi, Government Advocate For R5 : Dispensed with ************
O R D E R
Mr.P.Balathandayutham, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2.
2. Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of respondents 3 and 4.
3. Notice to the private respondent No.5 is dispensed with, as no adverse orders are proposed to be passed in this Writ Petition.
4. The petitioner has sent a representation dated 29.09.2025 to respondents 1 to 3, requesting them to assess separate property tax for six Page No. 2 of 5
houses.
5. It appears that the petitioner is only an agreement holder in respect of certain properties belonging to the fifth respondent, with whom he has entered into a sale agreement after paying an advance amount. It is noticed that no sale deed has been registered so far. As the petitioner, being only an agreement holder, has no right to claim assessment of the property. He is advised to approach the respondents after the sale deed is registered in this favour.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents as and when the sale deed is registered in his favour. No costs.
10.11.2025 nvi To:
1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector,
2. The Director, Page No. 3 of 5
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
3. The Block Development Officer, Kundrathur Panchayat Union,
4. The Executive Officer, Varatharajapuram Gram Panchayat, Kundrathur Panchayat Union, C.SARAVANAN, J.
nvi Page No. 4 of 5
10.11.2025 Page No. 5 of 5