Sical Multimodal Rail Transport Ltd. v. B.Narasimman (Died) 1. Saradha

CMP Nos.32891 and 32892 of 2025 in CRP SR Nos.173263 and 173264 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP Nos.32891 and 32892 of 2025 in CRP SR Nos.173263 and 173264 of 2025 SICAL Multimodal Rail Transport Ltd.

Rep. by its General Manager having office at No.73, Armenian street, Chennai-600001.

Petitioner in both cases Vs B.Narasimman (Died)

1. Saradha 2.Revathi 3.Ranjit Kumar 4.Duraisamy Venkatesan (Deceased) 5.Kamsala 6.Kanniammal 7.Jayalakshmi 8.Kumaran @ Muthukumaran 9.Nandhan @ Ramesh 10.S. Varalakshmi 11.V.Karpagam 12.V.Sishal 13.V.Ramadurga Respondents in both cases For Petitioner in both cases:

Mr.R.Arumugam COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed to accept the cause title necessitated on account of passing way of the second defendant viz., Venkatesan subsequent to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMP Nos.32891 and 32892 of 2025 in CRP SR Nos.173263 and 173264 of 2025 P.B. BALAJI,J.

vum the impugned proceedings. The petitioner now seeks to array the respondents 11 to 13 who are the legal heirs of the second defendant as parties in the Civil Revision Petition.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have also gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition.

3. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of the applications, the applications are ordered.

4. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision petitions, if they are otherwise in order and post the same in due course. 06-01-2026 vum To

1. The District Munsif, Ponneri.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis