← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/29613/2025dismissed

J.Ramar v. State By Its

2025-11-06Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

fIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 06.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR J.Ramar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by The Inspector of Police, CCD-1, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram Commissionerate, Chennai - 600 119.

(Crime No.22 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.22 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner :

Mr.K.G.Senthil Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.09.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 61(2) read with Sections 318(4), 335(2), 336(3), 336(4), 338 of BNS and Sections 66C & 66D of the IT Act, 2000 in Crime No.22 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is 1/4

ranked as A1 in this case and he joined hands with other accused collected a sum of Rs.19.95 crores from 70 victims under the pretext of online trading. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is also a victim in this case and his bank account was used by other accused and further no commission was also paid to him. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is pending. He further submitted that the main accused is operating in Delhi. He further submitted that the two accounts have been utilized for the purpose of scam, so far no money is recovered.

5. Considering the magnitude of the amount involved in this case and the fact that the investigation is pending and so far no money is recovered, if the bail is granted, it would hamper the investigation, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06.11.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, CCD-1, Central Crime Branch, Tambaram Commissionerate, Chennai - 600 119.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 06.11.2025 4/4