← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/30283/2025dismissed

Naveen v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

2025-11-06Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Naveen ... Petitioner -vsState Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District.

(Crime No.541 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.541 of 2025 pending investigation on the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********** 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.08.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 309(4), 311, 125, 324(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.541 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The allegation against this petitioner is that, this petitioner waylaid and robbed a sum of Rs.500/- from the defacto complainant. Hence this case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner was arrested and he is in judicial custody from 16.08.2025 and is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and submitted that the petitioner is having 15 previous cases. Hence, he strongly opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/4

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side, that the petitioner is having 15 previous cases, and considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner, and there is no change in circumstances of this second bail application has been filed, if the petitioner granted bail, he will indulge in similar activities, and the petitioner is this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06.11.2025 rna To 1.The Inspector of Police, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

rna 06.11.2025 4/4