R.Akash v. The State Rep. By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO. 30013 of 2025 R.Akash Petitioner/A4 Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Sholinghur Police Station Ranipet District In Crime No. 315 of 2025.
Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in Cr.No. 315 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vetrivel For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ----
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4) of BNS Act, 2023 and 25(1A) of ARMS Act, 1959, in Crime No. 315 of 2025, on the file of the 1/6
respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The allegation against the petitioner is that on 08.10.2025 at about 8.00 a.m., the petitioner along with other accused had planned to commit the offence of robbery from the people, by using deadly weapons. Hence the case.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that A2 & A3 had already arrested and released on bail in Crl.M.P.No.1484 and 1486 of 2025, dated 23.10.2025 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Ranipet. He further submits that the petitioner has no previous case. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to furnish sufficient solvent sureties for his release. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. He further submits that the petitioner has no previous case. He further submits that A2 and A3 had already arrested and released on bail by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Ranipet. He further submits that investigation is on. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Heard the learned counsels and perused the materials available on record.
6.Considering the nature of allegations; that the petitioner has no previous case; that the co-accused A2 and A3 had already granted bail in 3/6
Crl.M.P.Nos.1484 & 1486 of 2025, dated 23.10.2025 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Ranipet; this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sholinghur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and 4/6
Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;
[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];
[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 05.11.2025 MSM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Sholinghur.
5/6
2.The Inspector of Police Sholinghur Police Station Ranipet District In Crime No. 315 of 2025.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
6/6
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
MSM CRL OP NO. 30013 of 2025 7/6
05.11.2025 8/6