D.Israel v. Hepshiba @ Geetha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18-11-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
1. D.Israel S/o. Duraipandiyan, Presently, Associate Professor, ZLRI(Xavier Labour Relations Institute), C.H. Area (East Jamshedpur), Purbi, Singhbhum.
Jharkhand State 831001. Formerly at Door No.9/86, Vijay nagar, Kalampalayam Post, Coimbatore-641010.
Petitioner(s) Vs
1. Hepshiba @ Geetha W/o. D. Israel, 2.James S/o. Irael 3.John Joseph S/o. Irael, All are residing at No.3/67, teacher Colony, Masinayakkanpatti, Salem-636103.
Respondent(s) PRAYER To set aside the order dated 15.09.2025 in the above C.M.P.No.36 of 2024 in M.C.No.59 of 2012 passed by the Honble Family Court, Salem and pass such any other further order as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s):
D.Sivashanmugam
S. Kalpana Sivashanmugam For Respondent:
ORDER
This criminal revision case has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 15.09.2025 in the above C.M.P.No.36 of 2024 in M.C.No.59 of 2012 passed by the Family Court, Salem.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of direction of this Court the first respondent not cooperate for the proceedings and the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.12 Lakhs as per the order of this Court but the first respondent did not produce deletion certificates for removal of the petitioner's/respondent's name in the Ration Card, Voter list Pan Card, Aadhar Card, etc.,. Further, he alleged that the first respondent is leading a life with another man and not cooperate for the proceedings.
3. Considering the fact that out of marriage between the petitioner and the first respondent, they begotten two sons, who are under the care and custody of the first respondent, hence, the first respondent requires money to maintain to her sons. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.12 lakhs before the Trial court within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on such deposit being made, the first respondent is permitted to withdraw the same. According to the petitioner, first respondent is leading a life with another man. If at all the first respondent leading a life with another
man, the petitioner is entitled to file divorce petition as per manner known to law before the appropriate forum, without which the petitioner cannot seek direction to remove name of the petitioner from the ration card and other documents. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. 18-11-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes
T.V.THAMILSELVI J.
pbl CRL RC No. 2398 of 18.11.2025
Crl.R.C.No.2398 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
Today, this Criminal Revision is listed under the caption "for being mentioned" at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently, few typographical errors in the order passed by this Court on 18.11.2025 in this revision and that may be corrected.
3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, there shall be the following corrections in the order dated 18.11.2025:- (a)In para - 3, the first two lines shall stand substituted as follows:- "Considering the fact that marriage between the petitioner and the first respondent is under dispute, but they begotten two son", (b)In para -3, in the 7th line, the sentences beginning with "According to the petitioner, first respondent is leading a life with another man" shall stand deleted.
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
kkd
4. Registry is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections and issue fresh copy of the order to the parties.
19.02.2026 kkd Crl.R.C.No.2398 of 2025