← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/30128/2025dismissed

Venkatesan v. The State Represented By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police,

2025-11-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.30128 of 2025 Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Respondent (Crime No.525 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the Crime No.525 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No. 525 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joining hands with 1/4

other accused involved in illegal transportation of 1⁄4 unit of river sand, without any valid license. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the vehicle. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, submitted that the petitioner had involved in illegal transportation of 1⁄4 units of river sand and that he has one previous case pending against him. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, and the submissions made by learned counsels on either side, the fact that the petitioner ha one previous case and that the petitioner had allegedly indulged in illegal quarrying activities causing damage to the ecology, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the 2/4

petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05.11.2025 drl To

1. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Arni Town Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

drl 3/4

Crl.O.P.No.30128 of 2025 05.11.2025 4/4