Sargunanathan, v. State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Sargunanathan Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Inspector of Police Belukurichi Police Station Namakkal Namakkal District.

Crime No. 93 of 2025.

....Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 93 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.K.Ganesh For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 326 and 351 of BNS in Crime No. 93 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against petitioner is that on 24.10.2025, there was wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant due to previous enmity. Due to the impact, the de-facto complainant had sustained injury. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He also submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to furnish sufficient solvent sureties for his release. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsels and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Senthamangalam, Namakkal, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:- (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police at 10.30 am for a period of two weeks.

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 05.11.2025 MSM Copy to:

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Senthamangalam, Namakkal. 2.The Inspector of Police Belukurichi Police Station Namakkal, Namakkal District.

Crime No. 93 of 2025.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J., MSM 05.11.2025