Sachin v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-11-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Sachin S/o.Chella, No. Echankattu medu, Periya Obulapuram, Tiruvallur, Tamilnadu- 601 201.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Korukkupettai Railway Police Station, chennai. Crime No. 244/2025.

Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitoner on bail in the event of arrest in Crime no. 244/2025 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner(s):

Karthick S For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 126, 115, 109 of BNS in Crime No.244 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries and attempted to commit murder. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.27441 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025. Therefore, he prays for grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and there are no previous cases against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that the victim discharged from the hospital and

that there are no bad antecedents against the petitioner and also taking note of the fact that the co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.27441 of 2025 dated 03.10.2025, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial MagistrateI, Ponneri on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify

proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 5.00 p.m., until further orders. (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

06-11-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mpa To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Ponneri.

2.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Korukkupettai Railway Police Station, chennai. Crime No. 244/2025.

3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

mpa CRL OP No. 30275 of 06-11-2025