← Library
Madras High CourtWP/43293/2025disposed of

Dillibabu v. The District Collector

2025-11-17Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.Nos.48481 & 48482 of 2025

1. Dillibabu

2. Prema

3. Padmalakshmi

4. Josmin

5. Vasanthi

6. Ravishankar

7. Kannan

8. Mageshwari

9. Sivalingam 10.T.Rajendiran ..

Petitioners Vs.

1. The District Collector Chennai District At Chennai.

2. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Ripon Building, Chennai 600 003.

3. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Urban Habitant Development Board No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk Chennai 600 005.

4. The Tahsildar Thiruvottiyur Taluk Chennai 600 019.

..

Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from evicting or disturbing the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in Old Survey No.154, T.S.No.108/3, Ward-C, Block No.2, Ernavoor village, Thiruvottriyur Taluk, Chennai District pending disposal of the appeal dated 03.02.2025 pending on the file of the 1st respondent and on the light of judgment in W.P.No.2710/2025 dated 31.01.2025. For Petitioner :

Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan For Respondents :

Mr.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for Respondents 1 & 4 Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel for Respondent-2 Mr.S.Karthikeyan Standing Counsel for Respondent-3

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Petitioners' apprehension is that even before consideration of their objection and arriving at a decision by a speaking order,

respondent Corporation may proceed to evict petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for Corporation submits that objection, if any, submitted by petitioners within the time stipulated in the notice, will be duly considered and speaking order will be passed before taking any further action.

3. Placing on record the aforesaid statement, petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. WMP No.48481 of 2025 filed to permit petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition is allowed, subject to filing of separate court fee within two weeks. Other interim application stands closed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 17.11.2025 Index :

Yes/No Yes/No kpl

To

1. The District Collector Chennai District At Chennai.

2. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Ripon Building Chennai 600 003.

3. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Urban Habitant Development Board No.5, Kamarajar Salai Chepauk Chennai 600 005.

4. The Tahsildar Thiruvottiyur Taluk Chennai 600 019.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

(kpl) 17.11.2025