← Library
Madras High CourtWP/43247/2025disposed of

Tvl Ganapathi Traders v. The Deputy State Tax Officer

2025-11-10Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.43247 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.48431 & 48432 of 2025 TVL GANAPATHI TRADERS Rep by its Proprietor Sathya Rajendiran, 695/4, Dhanalaxmi Nagar V.C.Mottur Walajapet, Vellore, Tamil Nadu 632 513

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Deputy State Tax Officer Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Integrated Commercial Taxes Building Ward-B, No.25, Railway Station Road, Sandai (opp) Ranipet-632401

...Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in the Order vide GSTIN:33DYDPS8949Q1ZA/2019-2020 dated 13.06.2025 along with consequential proceedings under Section 73 of the Act issued in FORM GST DRC 07 vide Ref.No.ZD330625130702P dated 13.06.2025 for the year 20192020 to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mrs.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Page No. 1 of 7

Government Advocate

ORDER

Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order in FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Ref.No.ZD330625130702P dated 13.06.2025 along with detailed Order in GSTIN:33DYDPS8949Q1ZA/2019-2020 of the Respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST FORM DRC01 dated 28.05.2024 wherein the Petitioner was also called upon to appear for personal hearing.

4. The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders dated 20.06.2024, 03.07.2024 Page No. 2 of 7

and 19.07.2024, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. The Petitioner however neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing fixed. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.

5. It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 07.11.2025.

6. Under similar circumstances, Order has been quashed and case has been remitted back to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 10% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

7. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash from the Page No. 3 of 7

Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST FORM DRC-01 dated dated 28.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 13.06.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 28.05.2024.

9. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically raised/vacated.

10. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. Page No. 4 of 7

11. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

12. It is made clear that recovery of 10% of the disputed tax ordered above pertains only to the impugned Order dated 13.06.2025.

13. It is made clear that any amount paid by the petitioner pursuant to this order shall be adjusted towards pre-deposit.

14. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 10.11.2025 gv To:

The Deputy State Tax Officer Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Integrated Commercial Taxes Building Ward-B, Page No. 5 of 7

No.25, Railway Station Road, Sandai (opp) Ranipet-632401 C.SARAVANAN, J.

gv W.P.No.43247 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.48431 & 48432 of 2025 Page No. 6 of 7

10.11.2025 Page No. 7 of 7