Ramki v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.30466 of 2025 Ramki ... Petitioner Vs.
State rep by, The Inspector of Police, J-1, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai.
... Respondent (Cr.No.421of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to grant anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.421 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.Vinoth Kumar A For Respondent : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(6), 311 and 351(3) of BNS in Cr.No.421 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he joined hands with 1/5
other accused, waylaid and attacked the defacto complainant with knife and wooden log and also taken away a sum of Rs.1,200/- from him. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case and there was a street quarrel between the defacto complainant's group and the petitioner's group. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the coaccused was enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.OP.No.28059 of 2025 vide order dated 14.10.2025. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of allegations, the petitioner is not have bad 2/5
antecedents and the co-accused was enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made, before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:
(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;
(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the 3/5
respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act.
07.11.2025 Vv To
1. The IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai
2. The Inspector of Police, J-1, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai.
3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.
K.RAJASEKAR , J.
4/5
Vv Crl.O.P.No.30466 of 2025 07.11.2025 5/5