A. Sadham Hussain v. State Represented By The Inspector Of Police Semmanchery Police Station

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.30888 of 2025 A.Sadham Hussain ... Petitioner

Versus

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Semmanchery Police Station, Chengalpet District.

(Crime No.310 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in the Crime No.310 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Rajavel For Respondent :

Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********* 1/6

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 309(4), 351(2) of BNS , 2023 in Crime No.310 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant, robbed him a sum of Rs.6000/- and also attacked him. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is innocent persons and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that Rs.520/- has been recovered. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory 2/6

bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur, on condition that the petitioner shall also execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties (out of which one surety should be a blood surety) each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for interim anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall 3/6

affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on alternative days at 10.30 a.m.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[g] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

4/6

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

12.11.2025 mpa To 1.The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Semmanchery Police Station, Chengalpet District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

5/6

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

mpa 12.11.2025 6/6