← Library
Madras High Court/30597/2025granted

Bharathipriya v. State By

2025-11-10Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL.O.P.No.30597 of 2025 Bharathipriya ... Petitioner

Versus

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore.

(Crime No.426 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.426 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Arun For Respondent :

Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 308, 62 and 204 of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.426 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that she along with other 1/5

four accused persons, impersonated as police officers, went to the house of the defacto complainant, threatened him and demanded cash and jewels. However, the defacto complainant managed to come out of the house and lodged the complaint. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that no property was stolen from the defacto complainant and that the petitioner has no previous case against him. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are five accused in this case and the petitioner is ranked as A5. He further submitted that A1 to A4 were arrested and released on bail and that the petitioner has no previous case pending against her. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on 2/5

either side, and fact it is an case of attempting robbery and that the petitioner has no previous case and the co-accused was also released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

3/5

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

10.11.2025 drl To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Coimbatore.

2. The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4/5

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

drl CRL.O.P.No.30597 of 2025 10.11.2025 5/5