Vigneshwaran v. State Rep By The The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.11.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.Vigneshwaran

2. Aijth

3. Manirathinam ... Petitioners Vs.

State By, The Inspector of Police, R-11 Ramapuram Police Station, Chennai District.

Crime No.319 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.319 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/6

For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Padmanabhan For Respondent :

M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.319 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner used to give loans to various persons and accordingly also gave loans to one Radha Krishnan ( brother of the defacto complainant) and since he failed to pay the money, they abducted him to another place and demanded the Radha 2/6

Krishnan to call his brother Loganathan and to bring money otherwise he will not let the Radhakrishnan free. Immediately, the said Loganathan informed the Police and thereafter he was rescued. Hence, the case

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that due to money dispute, false complaint has been given. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that investigation in this case is pending. Hence, she opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 3/6

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner was involved in the offence of abduction and demanding money and the investigation in this case is pending, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 20.11.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, R-11 Ramapuram Police Station, Chennai District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/6

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 5/6

20.11.2025 6/6